Least Frequently Used(LFU)
LFU is a cache eviction policy that removes the least frequently accessed items first. It operates on the principle that items with the fewest accesses are less likely to be needed in the future. LFU maintains a count of how often each item is accessed and, when the cache is full, evicts the item with the lowest access frequency.
For Example:
Consider a cache with items X, Y, and Z. If item Z has been accessed fewer times than items X and Y, the LFU policy will retain the items X and Y and potentially evict item Z when the cache reaches its capacity.
In summary, LRU focuses on the recency of accesses, while LFU considers the frequency of accesses when deciding which items to retain in the cache.
Advantages of Least Frequently Used(LFU)
- Adaptability to Varied Access Patterns:
- LFU is effective in scenarios where some items may be accessed infrequently but are still essential. It adapts well to varying access patterns and does not strictly favor recently accessed items.
- Optimized for Long-Term Trends:
- LFU can be beneficial when the relevance of an item is better captured by its overall frequency of access over time rather than recent accesses. It is well-suited for scenarios where items with higher historical access frequencies are likely to be more relevant.
- Low Memory Overhead:
- LFU may have lower memory overhead compared to some implementations of LRU since it doesn’t require tracking timestamps. This can be advantageous in memory-constrained environments.
Disadvantages of Least Frequently Used(LFU)
- Sensitivity to Initial Access:
- LFU may not perform optimally during the initial stages when access frequencies are still being established. It relies on historical access patterns, and a new or less frequently accessed item might not be retained in the cache until its long-term frequency is established.
- Difficulty in Handling Changing Access Patterns:
- LFU can struggle in scenarios where access patterns change frequently. Items that were once heavily accessed but are no longer relevant might continue to be retained in the cache.
- Complexity of Frequency Counters:
- Implementing accurate frequency counting for items can add complexity to LFU implementations. Maintaining and updating frequency counters for every item in the cache can be resource-intensive.
Use Cases of Least Frequently Used(LFU)
- Database Query Caching:
- In database management systems, LFU can be applied to cache query results or frequently accessed data. It ensures that items that are accessed less frequently but are still important are retained in the cache.
- Network Routing Tables:
- LFU is useful in caching routing information for networking applications. Items representing less frequently used routes are kept in the cache, allowing for efficient routing decisions based on historical usage.
- Content Recommendations:
- In content recommendation systems, LFU can be employed to cache information about user preferences or content suggestions. It ensures that even less frequently accessed recommendations are considered over time.
Cache Eviction Policies | System Design
Cache eviction refers to the process of removing data from a cache to make room for new or more relevant information. Caches store frequently accessed data for quicker retrieval, improving overall system performance. However, caches have limited capacity, and when the cache is full, the system must decide which data to remove. The eviction policy determines the criteria for selecting the data to be replaced. This post will dive deep into Cache Eviction and its policies.
Important Topics for the Cache Eviction Policies
- What are Cache Eviction Policies?
- Cache Eviction Policies
- 1. Least Recently Used(LRU)
- 2. Least Frequently Used(LFU)
- 3. First-In-First-Out(FIFO)
- 4. Random Replacement