Appeal and Review
What is the suo-moto review?
Suo moto, which means “on its own motion,” describes the authority’s right to intervene in a situation without the consent of the opposing side. This expression often describes acts that a court does without first requesting or receiving a motion from the parties.
Is a judicial review an appeal?
A judicial review looks at the decision made by an administrative tribunal or another administrative decision-maker. A justice of the Supreme Court decides whether the tribunal or decision-maker had the right to reach the conclusion it did. It’s not a request for help.
Can a review and appeal be filed simultaneously?
This is a question not specifically addressed by the Code of Civil Procedure. On this subject, nevertheless, differing viewpoints exist. Certain courts have ruled that it is not appropriate to conduct an appeal and review process concurrently.
Who are the parties to the appeal?
An appellant is a party to a lawsuit who files an appeal. An appellee is the party that the appeal is filed against in court.
What are the grounds for a review case?
- Discovery of new evidence
- Error on the face of the record
- Another sufficient reason
Note: The information provided is sourced from various websites and collected data; if discrepancies are identified, kindly reach out to us through comments for prompt correction.
Difference between Appeal and Review
Appeal and Review both involve a re-evaluation of a decision, but they differ in their scope and purpose. An appeal typically involves presenting a case to a higher authority, seeking a reversal or modification of a decision made by a lower body. On the other hand, a review usually entails a comprehensive examination of a decision by the same body or a neutral party to ensure its correctness or fairness.
Table of Content
- What is Appeal?
- What is Review?
- Difference between Appeal and Review
- Conclusion
- Difference between Appeal and Review- FAQs