Background and Context of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

  • In the year 1947 when India gained independence there were 563 princely states in present-day India. These princely states had a choice of either joining India or joining Pakistan otherwise, they can remain under British rule if they want to, or otherwise, they can also remain independent and form their own independent country. 560 Princely states agreed to join India instantly and the remaining 3 also merged with India later on.
  • In 1949, the Government of India signed an agreement with the rulers of these states, which integrated them into the Indian democratic system. As part of this agreement, the rulers were granted certain privileges including the right to retain their titles, privileges, and the privy purse.
  • The issue of privy purses became a contentious one in the 1960s. because some politicians and social activists argued that the payments are unfair and that the former rulers should not receive any special privileges.
  • In 1971, the government of India under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi passed the 26th Constitutional Amendment. which abolished the system of privy purses for the former rulers.

Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

The 26th constitutional amendment was passed in 1971. It made many changes to the constitution which also included the abolition of the privy purse system for former Indian princes. This amendment also provides for the appointment of a commission to review the working of the Constitution every five years and submit a report to the President of India.
The concept of rulership and privy purse related to any clause and statement in the Constitution of India seemed to be incompatible with the very idea of an egalitarian society. So to end this clause, the 26th Constitutional Amendment Act was thus introduced so as to terminate this provision of privy purses and rulership and to move forward toward establishing an egalitarian society.

Similar Reads

The Objective of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

the main objective of the act is to abolish the payment of privy purses to former Indian princes, which had been guaranteed to them under the Indian Constitution. The Indian government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, sought to abolish the payment of privy purses as part of its broader program of nationalization and modernization....

Background and Context of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

In the year 1947 when India gained independence there were 563 princely states in present-day India. These princely states had a choice of either joining India or joining Pakistan otherwise, they can remain under British rule if they want to, or otherwise, they can also remain independent and form their own independent country. 560 Princely states agreed to join India instantly and the remaining 3 also merged with India later on. In 1949, the Government of India signed an agreement with the rulers of these states, which integrated them into the Indian democratic system. As part of this agreement, the rulers were granted certain privileges including the right to retain their titles, privileges, and the privy purse. The issue of privy purses became a contentious one in the 1960s. because some politicians and social activists argued that the payments are unfair and that the former rulers should not receive any special privileges. In 1971, the government of India under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi passed the 26th Constitutional Amendment. which abolished the system of privy purses for the former rulers....

Features of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

Abolition of Privy Purses: The primary objective of the amendment was to abolish the Privy Purse system for former Indian princes. The amendment took away the right of former rulers to receive an annual payment from the Government of India. Omission of articles 291 and 362: Articles 291 and 362 of the Constitution shall be omitted from direct effect from the Constitution of India....

Challenges and Criticism of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

Some former princely rulers argued that the Indian government was breaking the promise made to these rulers and violating their rights. The abolition of privy purses was also seen as a loss of the cultural heritage and traditions of the former princely states, which had distinct identities and ways of life. some Critics argued that the Indian government was trying to homogenize the country and suppress the diversity of its regions. Some former rulers of princely states challenged the abolition of the privy purse system on the grounds of violation of their fundamental rights....

Impact and Significance of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

The act abolished the privy purses and the former ruling titles. And this created a great impact on Indian history through this bold move by moving ahead in establishing an egalitarian society. The abolition of Privy Purses was seen as a major step towards ending the privileges of the former rulers and ensuring that all citizens were treated equally under the law. It also helped in reducing the financial burden on the Government of India as the former rulers were not required to make annual payments....

Article 363-A

Article 363A was inserted in the constitution of India by the 26th constitutional amendment act of 1971 and it is best known for the abolition of privy purses. It stated that the provision of rulership, privy purses, and titles are not in accordance with a healthy opined social order and are not compatible with the idea of an egalitarian society. Thus, To terminate this special provision for the former ruling elite class 26th constitutional amendment act was passed. The provision of Article 363A was a significant step toward the consolidation of the Indian republic and the integration of the former princely states into Indian society. It reflected the principles of social justice, equality, and democracy enshrined in the Indian Constitution and helped to create a more unified and harmonious nation....

FAQs on Twenty-Sixth Amendment Act, 1971

Q1. When was the 26th Constitutional Amendment passed?...