Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure
However, Indian federalism faces several challenges:
Regionalism
Regionalism refers to the strong sense of identity and loyalty that people in a particular region feel towards their own region, often at the expense of national unity. It involves prioritizing the interests of one’s own region over those of the nation as a whole. Regionalism can manifest in various forms, including cultural, economic, and political aspects. In some cases, it may lead to demands for greater autonomy or even secession from the larger political entity. Regionalism can pose challenges to national cohesion and governance, as it may undermine efforts to promote unity and equal development across all regions of a country.
Language Conflicts
The diversity of languages in India can sometimes challenge the federal spirit of the Constitution. India recognizes 22 languages constitutionally, alongside hundreds of dialects spoken across the country. Conflict arises when the dominant unit of the federation seeks to impose a specific language on others. The debate over the official language in India remains contentious. Opposition from southern states against Hindi as the official language has fueled a longstanding language crisis in the country.
Centralized Amendment Power
In most federations, the authority to amend the Federal Constitution is shared between the federation and its constituent units. However, in India, the power of constitutional amendment rests solely with the Centre, governed by Article 368 and other provisions. While the ratification of half of the states is required in certain limited cases, states in the Indian Union have minimal influence in this crucial aspect of governance.
Economic Incompatibilities of the units
Economic disparities and fiscal differences among constituent states present challenges to a federation. These imbalances often lead to demands for economic planning, regional economic equality, and financial autonomy for states. However, seeking financial equality within regions can create complications within a federation.
In India, certain states are identified as economically disadvantaged and receive grants-in-aid to address this issue. Nevertheless, adhering strictly to the principle of equalization may negatively impact national income and overall economic growth.
Centralised Planning
Although economic and social planning is listed in the Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the Union government in India retains significant authority over national and regional decision-making and planning.
Centralized planning, administered through bodies like the Planning Commission and now the NITI Aayog, appointed by the Centre, results in considerable legislative power resting with the Union. Additionally, the financial dependence of states on the Centre, along with their administrative inferiority, renders them relatively powerless.
State governments rely on the Central Government for financial assistance, further weakening their autonomy. This lack of state authority poses challenges to the practice of federalism in India.
Related Links
Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure
Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure: The Indian system of Federalism is a bit unique. It is called a quasi-federal system because it has features of both a federation and a union. According to Article 1 of the Indian Constitution, “India, which is also called Bharat, will be a Union of States.” Federalism in India didn’t happen by states joined together to form a federal union. Instead, it changed from a unitary system to a federal one.
There are two governments in India’s federal system: the State Government and the Central Government. There’s also an independent judiciary system. However, because of its quasi-federal nature, India faces many issues and challenges related to its federal structure.
Let us learn more about the challenges of federal structure!
Challenges Pertaining to Federal Structure