Comparison Between Openshift and Kubernetes
|
Features |
OpenShift |
Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
|
Origin and Ownership |
Red Hat started and effectively maintained by Red Hat |
At first, it was created by Google, presently part of the CNCF (Cloud Native Computing Foundation), with contributions from different organizations |
|
User Interface |
It comes with a web-based console for easier management |
Web-based services are accessible yet may require extra arrangements. |
|
Application Lifecycle Management |
Incorporates built-in CI/DD pipelines and integration with Jenkins for continuous integration. |
Requires additional tools and configurations for CI/CD support. |
|
Distribution |
It is an open-source and enterprise version, i.e., an open-shift container platform. It includes an enterprise version and has additional features |
It is also an open-source platform. |
|
Market adoption |
It is widely used among organizations using red-hat technologies |
It is the most popular container orchestration platform |
Openshift VS Kubernetes
Containerization is usually characterized as “the packaging of various applications to all the more successfully develop, manage, and deploy them across different infrastructures.” Containerization empowers organizations to turn out to be more agile and scalable. The outcome is improved application development efficiency Progressively, organizations are understanding the benefits these tools offer.
You need to know a lot about the platforms before you can begin to understand the differences between OpenShift and Kubernetes. Thus, before we research the distinctions between the two stages, how about we comprehend what they are?
However, the similarities end there. A few of the differences between OpenShift and Kubernetes are listed below.