Difference between Graylog and ELK
|
Graylog |
ELK |
|
|---|---|---|
| Support | It is written in java and supports GLEF(Graylog extended log format). | It is written in java and supports JSON format. |
| Syslog Files | It does not accept Syslog files and data is sent directly. | It supports the majority of data types like JSON etc. |
| Builtin | Built-in alerting is available and alerts are based on stream data. | Built-in alerting is not available and third-party plugins are used to send alerts. |
| Developed for | It is only developed for log management and log analysis. | It is a multipurpose stack. |
| Support | Real-time UDP logging / GLEF logging is supported by Graylog. | It supports full-text query search analysis. |
| Focus | It mainly focuses on log analysis. | It mainly focuses on big data analysis. |
| Visualization | It is the whole package of visualization. | Visualization is done by Kibana in this tool. |
| GUI | It has an interactive and user-friendly GUI. | It has a less interactive and user-friendly GUI as compared to Graylog. |
| Organizations | Netflix, Cisco, Verizon, and Linkedin are some organizations that use Graylog. | Appbrain, Hotjar, and stock media are some organizations that use the ELK stack. |
Graylog vs ELK
To organize the workflow and coordinate teams, management tools are used. With the help of management tools, one can complete any tasks faster, track projects, manage your team, and plan for future tasks. An engineer goes and checks out the log files and with the right application to handle the tasks, it becomes easy to seek out the problem in the device. ELK stack is used for big data analysis whereas Graylog is mostly used for log analysis. They are two prominent log management solutions. Both Graylog and ELK have their own pros and cons. Also, everyone has different requirements, which should help the user to make a decision. Let’s find out in what aspects they differ.