Difference between Kibana and Splunk
| Kibana | Splunk | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Trends | It is new in the market in compare to Splunk. | It is well-established software. |
| Set-Up | Set-up is Easy and very flexible with its setup. | Set-up is Quite complex and is very powerful with its on-premise/off-premise integration. |
| Solaris portability | It offers a Solaris portability feature. | It does not offer Solaris portability feature. |
| Expenses | It is open-source and hence free. | It is licensed and hence charged. It is quite expensive. |
| Usage | It uses Apache Lucene’s syntax. | It uses its custom-written Search Processing Language. |
| Security | It offers security but less when compared with Splunk. | It offers extra security to users’ data. |
| Speed | It is slow when compared to Splunk. | It is fast. |
| Focus | The focus is mainly on monitoring tools. | The focus is mainly on log analysis. |
| Interactive | It is highly interactive and its User Interface is quite friendly. | It is not as interactive as Kibana. |
| Debugging | Debugging is not available. | It provides debugging and troubleshooting support. |
| Data Formats | It allows data formats like JSON and can be integrated with third parties to send data in the desired format. | It allows any data format like .csv, log files, JSON, etc. It is quite flexible in integrating with other plugins. |
| Organizations | LinkedIn, Netflix, and StackOverflow are a few organizations that use Kibana. | Bosch, Cisco, and Adobe are a few organizations that use Splunk. |
Kibana vs Splunk
Kibana is an open-source visualization tool whereas Splunk comes under the category of log management and analysis. Both Kibana and Splunk are tools that have outstanding features. Setting-up Kibana is quite easy whereas setting up Splunk is a complex task. It is not at all easy to choose which one to use as both support features of visualization that are Graph, Histogram, Table, and Heatmap.