Firebase vs AWS – Comparison Table
Aspect |
Firebase |
AWS |
---|---|---|
Performance |
Real-time, low-latency |
High-performance, scalable |
Scalability |
Automatic scaling |
Extensive options |
Database Options |
Realtime, NoSQL |
RDS, DynamoDB, Aurora |
Serverless Computing |
Firebase Cloud Functions |
AWS Lambda, wide integrations |
Authentication & Security |
Firebase Auth |
AWS Cognito, encryption |
Integrations & Ecosystem |
Seamless with Google |
Vast, third-party support |
Support & SLA |
Various plans, SLAs |
Tailored plans, uptime SLAs |
Pricing |
Simple, usage-based |
Complex, tiered |
Firebase vs AWS: Top Differences
Choosing the best backend solution is the first step in building a successful web or mobile app. Among the two prime competitors, Firebase (Google) and Amazon Web Services (AWS), that appear during the cloud computing period, there lies a great deal of power. You forget about all those things that you need to go through while developing Firebase because it comes ready with integrated services that are user-friendly.
However, AWS has unmatched flexibility as well as a wide range of services to help you build customized and scalable backends for even the most complex workloads. This guide delves into each platform, compares feature sets, and provides insights that can facilitate decision-making along this line.