Layer-4(L4) vs. GSLB load balancers
Here’s a table comparing Layer-4 (L4) Load Balancers and Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB):
Feature | Layer-4 (L4) Load Balancers | Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) |
---|---|---|
Layer of Operation | Transport layer (Layer-4) | Operates at both transport and application layers |
Traffic Distribution Criteria | IP addresses, port numbers | Proximity, health, and performance of servers |
Content Inspection | Limited or none | May involve health monitoring and DNS-based routing |
SSL Termination | Usually not performed at this layer | May involve SSL termination |
Efficiency | Generally faster due to less content inspection | Depends on the implementation and specific features |
Use Cases | Basic load balancing based on IP and port information | Applications with a global user base, multiple data centers, and geographic dispersion |
Examples | HAProxy, NGINX, IPVS | F5 BIG-IP, Citrix ADC, Akamai GTM |
Layer-4(L4), Layer-7(L7), and GSLB Load Balancers
Load balancers play a critical role in distributing network or application traffic across multiple servers to ensure optimal performance, reliability, and scalability. Layer-4 (L4), Layer-7 (L7), and Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) are different types of load balancing mechanisms designed to address various needs within network architectures.
Table of Content
- Layer-4(L4) Load Balancer (Network Layer Load Balancer)
- Layer-7(L7) Load Balancer (Application Layer Load Balancer)
- GSLB (Global Server Load Balancer) a.k.a. Multi-site Load Balancer
- Layer-4(L4) Load Balancer vs Layer-7(L7) Load Balancer
- Layer-7(L7) vs. GSLB load balancers
- Layer-4(L4) vs. GSLB load balancers
- Layer-4(L4) vs. Layer-7(L7) vs. GSLB load balancers