Legal Defense for Blackmail
The following defenses can be used:
1. Absence of Threat: The defense may argue that no explicit threat was made by the defendant against the victim.
2. Victim’s Awareness of Inability to Carry Out Threat: The defense may assert that the victim was aware or should have been aware that the defendant lacked the capability or means to carry out the threat.
3. False Accusations by the Victim: The defense may claim that the victim falsely accused the defendant of blackmail for personal gain or ulterior motives, such as revenge or financial benefit.
4. Lack of Intent to Coerce: The defense may argue that the defendant did not have the intention to coerce or force the victim into compliance with their demands.
5. Ineffectiveness of Efforts: The defense may contend that any actions taken by the defendant were ineffective in achieving the desired outcome or providing any advantage to the defendant.