The Architecture of Vendor Lock-in
As shown in the above diagram,
In Single Cloud Architecture, an organization makes use of a single cloud provider for all of its computing needs. This can include infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and software as a service (SaaS) offerings.
- The organization may also use features that are only available from that specific provider. In this case, the organization becomes dependent on that single provider for all of its computing needs, and it can be difficult to switch to a different provider without significant costs or disruptions to its operations.
- The main disadvantage of single cloud architecture is the lack of flexibility and the inability to easily switch providers.
In Multi-Cloud Architecture, an organization makes use of multiple cloud providers for different services or applications. For example, an organization might use AWS for infrastructure and Azure for applications.
- This approach can provide a level of flexibility and redundancy and can reduce the risk of becoming too dependent on a single provider.
- The main advantage of multi-cloud architecture is the ability to reduce vendor lock-in, as the organization is not dependent on a single provider. Additionally, it can allow organizations to take advantage of different providers’ strengths and capabilities, and also to spread the risk by not putting all their eggs in one basket.
Vendor Lock-in in Cloud Computing
Pre-requisite: Cloud Computing
Cloud computing is a model for delivering information technology services in which resources are retrieved from the internet through web-based tools and applications, as opposed to a direct connection to a server. This allows for the delivery of on-demand computing resources, such as storage, applications, and other services, over the internet. This enables users to access and use these resources as needed, without having to invest in and maintain their own infrastructure.