What is Revision?
Revisional competence over cases is granted to the High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In other words, Revision refers to the process of going over something again, checking it for accuracy, and making sure it is accurate. The main goal of Section 115 is to prevent subordinate courts from acting in an arbitrary, unlawful, or irregular manner when carrying out their official duties. This clause gives the High Court the authority to ensure that decisions made in lower courts follow the law, respect jurisdictional limits, and advance justice. Ninety days is the window in which an application for revision can be filed. The most common grounds for amendment are issues related to jurisdiction. Errors of jurisdiction committed by lower courts can be corrected by the High Court as per the provisions of the act.
Key Features of Revision:
- By resolving jurisdictional inaccuracies, Section 115 gives the High Court the authority to intervene and guarantee the effective administration of justice while maintaining the integrity and equity of judicial procedures.
- The main goal of Section 115 is to prevent subordinate courts from acting in an arbitrary, capricious, unlawful, or irregular manner when carrying out their official duties.
- Ninety days is the window in which an application for revision can be filed. The most common grounds for amendment are issues related to jurisdiction.
Difference between Revision and Review
Revision and Review are the terms under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Revision involves a comprehensive re-examination and potential amendment of a decision by a higher court, aimed at rectifying errors or injustices. In contrast, Review focuses on evaluating the procedural correctness of a lower court’s decision by a higher court, without delving deeply into the case’s merits.
Table of Content
- What is Revision?
- What is Review?
- Difference Between Revision and Review
- Conclusion
- Revision and Review-FAQs