Chapter 2 New Notions of Kingship| Class 12 History Notes

From the 6th Century B.C.E, the most visible change noticed in India was the emergence of early states, empires, and kingdoms. The Mauryan Empire lasted for about 150 years, which is not very long in the vast span of the subcontinent’s history. Within the frontiers of the empire, control was not uniform. By the second century B.C.E., new chiefdoms and kingdoms emerged in several parts of the subcontinent.

Let us learn more about new notions of kingship!

Chapter 2 New Notions of Kingship| Class 12 History Notes

Sources for New Notions of Kingship

Sources

Characteristics

Prashastis

  • Factual information about the King
  • Composed in the praise of kings.
  • For example: the Allahabad Pillar Inscription.

Coins

  • They include elements like scripts, images, and the context in which they were found.
  • Coins facilitated long-distance transactions.
  • For example: the gold coins of the Gupta rulers.

Literature

  • Those who composed literary works often treated them as works of poetry rather than an account, that were true.
  • Historians must constantly access the statements made in inscriptions to judge whether they are true, plausible, or exaggerated.

Accounts of Foreign Travellers

  • Fa-Hien was a famous Chinese Buddhist devotee who traveled to India during the term of Chandragupta II.
  • He gives us detailed information about the administrations under the Gupta rulers.

New Notions of Kingship

Chiefs and Kings in the South

  • The new kingdoms that emerged in the Deccan and further south, including the chiefdoms of the Cholas, Cheras, and Pandyas in Tamilakam proved to be stable and prosperous.
  • We know about these states from a variety of sources. For example, the Tamil Sangam text contains poems describing the chiefs and how they acquired and distributed resources.
  • Many chiefs and kings, including the Satavahanas who ruled over parts of western and central India, and the Shakas, a people of Central Asian origin who established kingdoms in the north-western and western parts of the subcontinent, derived revenues from long-distance trade.
  • The social status of Satvahanas was often obscure, but they tried to maintain their social status within the society through marriage alliances and religious rituals.

Divine Status of Kingship

Kushanas

  • One means of claiming high status was to identify with a variety of deities. This strategy is best exemplified by the Kushanas who ruled over a vast kingdom extending from Central Asia to northwest India.
  • Their history has been reconstructed from inscriptions and textual traditions. The notions of kingship they wished to project are perhaps best evidenced in their coins and sculptures.
  • Colossal statues of Kushana rulers have been found installed in a shrine at Mat near Mathura (Uttar Pradesh). Similar statues have been found in a shrine in Afghanistan as well.
  • Some historians feel this indicates that the Kushanas considered themselves godlike.
  • Many Kushana rulers also adopted the title devaputra, or “son of god”, possibly inspired by Chinese rulers who called themselves sons of heaven.

Gupta Empire

  • By the fourth century, there is evidence of larger states, including the Gupta Empire. Many of these depended on samantas, men who maintained themselves through local resources including control over land.
  • They offered homage and provided military support to rulers. Powerful samantas could become kings: conversely, weak rulers might find themselves being reduced to positions of subordination.
  • Histories of the Gupta rulers have been reconstructed from literature, coins, and inscriptions, including prashastis, composed in praise of kings in particular, and patrons in general, by poets.
  • While historians often attempt to draw factual information from such compositions, those who composed and read them often treasured them as works of poetry. rather than as true accounts.
  • The Prayaga Prashasti (also known as the Allahabad Pillar Inscription) composed in Sanskrit by Harishena, the court poet of Samudragupta, arguably the most powerful of the Gupta rulers (c. fourth century CE), is a case in point.

Conclusion – Class 12 History Notes Chapter 2 New Notions of Kingship

Hence, we can conclude that the kings in various dynasties, to gain some stature among their subjects started associating themselves with the name of various gods, providing land grants to religious institutions and developing high-sounding titles.

People Also View:

Chapter 2 New Notions of Kingship- FAQs

What do you mean by “Divine Theory of Kingship”?

“Divine Theory of Kingship” was a concept that was used to justify the absolute power of the King. It points out that the King is appointed on the behalf of the God and he is answerable only to the God for his deeds and actions.

What are the sources related to the new notions of Kingship?

The sources that are related to the new notions of Kingship are : Prashastis , Coins, Literature and Accounts of Foreign travellers.

What were the new kingdoms that emerged in the Deccan and South India?

The new kingdoms that emerged in the Deccan and in South India are: chiefdoms of the Cholas, Cheras, and Pandyas in Tamilakam

What were the strategies used by the Kushanas in order to claim high status?

The strategies used by the Kushanas in order to claim high status were:

  • One means of claiming high status was to identify with a variety of deities.
  • Their history has been reconstructed from inscriptions and textual traditions. The notions of kingship they wished to project are perhaps best evidenced in their coins and sculptures.
  • Many Kushana rulers also adopted the title devaputra, or “son of god”, possibly inspired by Chinese rulers who called themselves sons of heaven.

Who were the Samantas?

Samantas were men who maintained themselves through local resources including control over land. They offered homage and provided military support to rulers. Powerful samantas could become kings: conversely, weak rulers might find themselves being reduced to positions of subordination.