Optimization

The time complexity of the previous solution is O(n). We can enhance the efficiency of the solution to operate in O(Logn) time. When we closely examine the pattern of counting strings without consecutive 1’s, we can discern that the count is, in fact, the (n+2)th Fibonacci number for n >= 1. The Fibonacci Numbers sequence is as follows: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 141, and so on.

n = 1, count = 0  = 21 - fib(3) 
n = 2, count = 1 = 22 - fib(4)
n = 3, count = 3 = 23 - fib(5)
n = 4, count = 8 = 24 - fib(6)
n = 5, count = 19 = 25 - fib(7)
................

This optimization allows us to calculate the count much more efficiently using the Fibonacci sequence.

Example: This example shows the use of the above-explained approach.

Javascript
// Fibonacci Series using Optimized 
// Matrix Exponentiation Function 
// that returns the nth Fibonacci number

function fib(n) {
    
    // Initialize the base matrix
    let F = [
        [1, 1],
        [1, 0],
    ];

    // Handle the case when n is 0
    if (n === 0) {
        return 0;
    }

    // Calculate F^n using optimized 
    // matrix exponentiation
    power(F, n - 1);

    // The result is in the top-left element of F
    return F[0][0];
}

// Function to multiply two matrices
function multiply(F, M) {
    let x = F[0][0] * M[0][0] +
            F[0][1] * M[1][0];
    let y = F[0][0] * M[0][1] +
            F[0][1] * M[1][1];
    let z = F[1][0] * M[0][0] +
            F[1][1] * M[1][0];
    let w = F[1][0] * M[0][1] +
            F[1][1] * M[1][1];

    F[0][0] = x;
    F[0][1] = y;
    F[1][0] = z;
    F[1][1] = w;
}

// Optimized version of matrix exponentiation
function power(F, n) {
    if (n <= 1) {
        return;
    }

    let M = [
        [1, 1],
        [1, 0],
    ];

    power(F, Math.floor(n / 2));
    multiply(F, F);

    if (n % 2 !== 0) {
        multiply(F, M);
    }
}

// Driver code
let n = 11;

console.log(Math.pow(2, n) - fib(n + 2));

Output
1815

Time Complexity: O(logN)

JavaScript Program to Count Strings with Consecutive 1’s

Given a number n, count the Optimized number of n-length strings with consecutive 1s in them.

Examples:

Input  : n = 2
Output : 1
There are 4 strings of length 2, the
strings are 00, 01, 10 and 11. Only the
string 11 has consecutive 1's.
Input : n = 3
Output : 3
There are 8 strings of length 3, the
strings are 000, 001, 010, 011, 100,
101, 110 and 111. The strings with
consecutive 1's are 011, 110 and 111.
Input : n = 5
Output : 19

Table of Content

  • Naive Approach
  • Optimized Approach
  • Optimization

Similar Reads

Naive Approach:

...

Optimized Approach:

We’ve created a variable called “ans,” which serves as a counter to keep track of how many strings contain two consecutive ones. Our approach involves generating all possible binary strings of a specified length using a recursive technique that involves picking and not picking of elements. Once we’ve generated these strings, we examine each one to determine if it contains two or more consecutive ones. If so, we increment the “ans” variable by 1 to keep count. In the end, we simply output the value stored in the “ans” variable, which represents the total number of strings with at least two consecutive ones....

Optimization:

To address the reverse problem of counting strings that don’t contain consecutive 1’s, we can utilize a Dynamic Programming solution, as explained in a separate solution (see here). We can leverage that solution to find the count we need by following these steps:...

Using a bottom-up dynamic programming approach:

The time complexity of the previous solution is O(n). We can enhance the efficiency of the solution to operate in O(Logn) time. When we closely examine the pattern of counting strings without consecutive 1’s, we can discern that the count is, in fact, the (n+2)th Fibonacci number for n >= 1. The Fibonacci Numbers sequence is as follows: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 141, and so on....